The Effect of Graphic Organizers on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension

Horas Hutabarat

 Damayanty Hotmauli

Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia


This study employed the experimental design. It aimed at investigating whether or not graphic organizers (GOs) use affects students’ reading comprehension. The participants were 60 eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 102 Jakarta. These students were divided into two groups: the experimental and the control group. Each group consisted of 30 students. Both groups were taught reading comprehension in eight sessions using the same learning materials. However, the control group was taught in the way they were used to be taught, and the experimental group was taught using GOs technique. The same pretest and posttest were administered to both groups to collect the data. The obtained data were analyzed by using SPSS 21. The results showed that the post-test mean score of the experimental class is 84.66, and the post-test mean score of the control class is 56.33. The hypothesis test showed there is a significant effect of GOs use. The value of Sig. of equality variances (0. 043) was lower than Sig. α (0.05). Therefore, it was concluded that there is a significant effect of using GOs in advancing the eleventh-grade EFL students’ reading comprehension in SMA Negeri 102 Jakarta. This study pointed out that GOs can be an effective technique to improve EFL students’ reading comprehension.

Key Words: graphic organizers, reading comprehension, EFL

Free PDF File


Biria, R., & Sharifi, M. M. (2013). Graphic organizers and reading comprehension ability: Evidence from Iranian EFL university students. Sino-US English Teaching, 10(5), 358-365.

Block, C., Gambrell, L,. & Pressley, M. (2002). Improving comprehension instruction rethinking research, theory, and classroom practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Crosby, R. (2013). Reading attitudes as a predictor of Latino adolescents’ reading comprehension (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of California, Riverside, CA.

Deporter, B., & Hernacki, M. (1992). Quantum learning: membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Translated by Alwiyah Abdurrahman. Bandung: Kaifa PT Mizan Pustaka.

Ellis, E., & Howard, P. (2005). Graphic organizers: Power tools for teaching students with learning disabilities. Graphic Organizers and Learning Disabilities 1, 1-5.

Firmanto, S. O. (2005). Student’s behavior of reading comprehension: Expectations and follow up. Paper presented at the LIA International Conference, Jakarta.

Fisher, A. L. (2001). Implementing graphic organizer notebooks: The art and science of teaching content. Reading Teacher, 55(2), 116-120.

Fitrawati. (2009). Improving Senior High School Students’ Reading Comprehension through Reading Strategies Derived from Genre-Based Approach. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni 10(2), p. 89-99.

Grabe, W. & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. London: Pearson Education, Inc.

Hamm, M. & Adams, D. (1992). The collaborative dimensions of learning. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Heilman, A, (1988). The principles and the practices of teaching reading. Ohio: Charles E. Merill Publishing Co.

Jiang, X. (2012). Effects of discourse structure graphic organizers on EFL reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24 (1), 84-105.

Klingner, J. K., & Geisler, D. (2008). Helping classroom reading teachers distinguish between language acquisition and learning disabilities. In Klingner, J. K., Hoover, J. J. & Baca, L. M.  (Eds.). Why do English language learners struggle with reading? Distinguishing language acquisition from learning disabilities (pp. 57-74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Krashen, S.  & Brown, C.L.  (2007). What is academic language proficiency? STETS Language and Communication Review, 6(1), 1-4.

Krasnic, T. 2011. How to study with mind maps: The concise learning method. Concise Books Publishing.

Kweldju, S. (1996). English department students’ interest and strategies in reading their content area textbooks. TEFLIN Journal, 8(1), 104-117.

Leipzig, H.D. (2001). What Is Reading?.www.readingrockets.orgarticle/352

Maria, K. (1990). Reading comprehension instruction, issues and strategies. Parkton, MD: York Press.

McKnight, K. (2010). The teacher’s big book of graphic organizers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Miranda, T., Williams-Ross, D., Johnson, K., & McKenzie, N. (2011). Reluctant readers in middle school: Successful engagement with text using the e-reader. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 1(6), 81-91. Retrieved November 2013 from

Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pardede (2010). A review & on reading theories and its implication to the teaching of reading. Retrieved June 2014 from

Pardede, P. (2007). Developing critical reading in the EFL classroom. Retrieved September 2013 from

Parker, C. (2007). 30 Graphic organizers for reading. USA: Shell Education

Rahvard, Z.J. (2010). Cooperative Learning Strategies and Reading Comprehension. California Linguistic Notes, 35(2). Retrieved October 2013 from

Resmi, E. C., Wijaya, B., & Suhartono, L. (2012). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension of Recount Text through Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Technique. Tanjungpura: University Pontianak

Roa, M.A. (2011). Making connections: impact of graphic organizers in reading comprehension and summarization (Master’s thesis). Universidad de la Sabana, Chía, Colombia.

Rumiris, J. (2014). Improving university students’ reading comprehension using graphic organizers: An action research. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 7(3), pp. 157-164 

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Slavin, R. E. (1994). Student teams achievement divisions: STAD. Using Student Team Learning, 2(1), 14–18, 20–21, 23–26, 43–47.

Tiantong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (STAD) technique through the moodle to enhance learning achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4), 85–92.

Wichadee, S. 2006. The Effects of Cooperative Learning on English Reading Skills and Attitudes of the First-Year Students at Bangkok University. Retrieved September 2013 from

Note: This article was presented in UKI English Education Department Collegiate Forum held on Friday, December 4, 2015


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.