Students’ Attitudes towards Face-to-Face and Blended Learning Instructions in English Class

Students’ Attitudes towards Face-to-Face and Blended Learning Instructions in English Class

Situjuh Nazara

El. Febriana Fita Wardaningsih

Universitas Kristen Indonesia


Due to ICT accelerating penetration into the educational sector, the use of blended learning in almost all disciplines, including EFL, keep on growing. In relation to this, studies concerning students’ attitudes toward face-to-face and blended learning instructions are important in order to get a more solid basis for ICT use in learning. This study aimed at exploring students’ attitudes towards face-to-face and blended learning instructions in English class and their preference towards these two learning instructions. Employing the mixed methods design, quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 42 students of the English Education Department of Universitas Kristen Indonesia Jakarta using a questionnaire and interview. The finding indicated that the students’ attitudes were moderate towards face-to-face instruction and positive toward blended learning. Although they viewed face-to-face instruction interesting, they thought blended learning is more effective, efficient, convenient and useful in learning the subject being taken. They also agreed that blended learning could develop their critical thinking, creativity computer skills and internet skills. It also encouraged them to be independent learners. Based on the finding, it is suggested to have blended learning implemented in English class.

Keywords: face-to-face instruction, blended learning, EFL


Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M.Y. (2008). A study of student’s perceptions in a blended learning environment based on different learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183-193.

Basioudis, I. G., De Lange, P., Suwardy, T., & Wells, P. (2012). Accounting students’ perceptions of a learning management system: An international comparison. Accounting Research Journal, 25(2), 72-86.

Brown, K. M. (1996). The role of internal and external factors in the discontinuation of off-campus students. Distance Education, XVII (1), 44-71.

Chandra, V., & Fisher, D.L. (2009). Students’ perceptions of a blended web-based learning environment. Learning Environment Research, 12, 31-44.

Cooner, T. S. (2010). Creating opportunities for students in large cohorts to reflect in and on practice: lessons learnt from a formative evaluation of students’ experiences of a technology-enhanced blended learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 271–286.

Deliagaoglu, O. & Yıldırım, Z. (2008). Design and development of a technology enhanced hybrid instruction based on MOLTA model: Its effectiveness in comparison to traditional instruction. Computers & Education, 51(1), 474-483.

Eduviews. (2009). Blended learning: Where online and face-to-face instruction intersect for 21st-century teaching and learning. A K-12 Leadership Series.

Echavez-Solano, N. (2003). A comparison of student outcomes and attitudes in technology-enhanced vs. traditional second-semester Spanish language courses. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Minnesota.

Face-to-Face Instruction. (2009). Retrieved July 1, 2015, from Purdue University:

Garrison, R., & Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between online and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53-64.

Graham, C. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives.  San Fransisco: John Wiley and Sons.

Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W. & Harrison, B. (2011). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18: 4-14.

Gulc,  E.  (2006,  September).  Using blended learning to accommodate different learning styles. Retrieved June 2014 from

Guzer, B. and Caner, H. (2013). The past, present and future of blended learning: an in-depth analysis of literature. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, pp. 4596–4603. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992

Gynn, C. (2001). The pedagogy of technology-enhanced learning environments. Ohio State: Faculty and TA development.

Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.J, Drysdale, J. S, & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. Internet and Higher Education, 20: 20-34

Hughes, G. (2007). Using blended learning to increase learner support and improve retention. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(3), 349-363

Laine, L. (2003). Is e-learning effective for IT training? XXVII (6), 55-60.

Lopez-Perez, M.V., Pérez-López M. C., & Ariza., L. R. (2012) Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes Computers & Education 56, 818–826

Mackay, S. & Stockport, G.J. (2006). “Blended Learning, Classroom and E-Learning.” Business Review, Cambridge, 5(1).

Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2006). Elearning: The key concepts. London: Routledge. McConnell,  D.  (2000).  Implementing computer supported cooperative learning. London: Kogan Page Limited.

Murday, K., Ushida, E., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2008). Learners’ and teachers’ perspectives on language online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 125-142.

Noble, D. (2002). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review Press.

O’Malley, J., & McCraw, H. (1999). Students perceptions of distance learning, online learning and the traditional classroom. Online journal of distance learning administration, 2(4). Retrieved April 2014 from omalley24.html

Ong, C. S., & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829.

Pape, L., Sheehan, T., & Worrell, C. (2012, April). How to do more or less: lessons from online learning. Learning & Leading with Technology. Retrieved May 2014 from

Pardede, P. (2015). Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Perception of Edmodo Use as a Complementary Learning Tool. A paper presented at UKI English Education Department Collegiate Forum held on Friday, June 12, 2015. Retrieved August 2015 from

Pardede, P. (2012). Blended learning for ELT. Journal of English Teaching, 2(3), pp. 165-178.

Pardede, P. (2011). Using BALL to develop writing skills: Students’ interest and perception. Paper presented at SWCU International Conference 2011 held in Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga, November 2011.

Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, XXV (4), 401-425.

Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examing social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Retrieved April 2014 from

Riel, M. & Paul, S. (2009). “Collaborative Knowledge Building: Blending In-Class and Online Learning Formats.” Distance Learning, 6:3, 2009. Retrieved July 2014 from

Riffell, S. and Sibley, D. (20105). Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduate biology courses: An evaluation of a hybrid course format, Computers & Education, 44, pp. 217-235.

Sanders, D., & Morrison-Shetlar, A. (2002). Student attitudes toward web-enhanced instruction in an introductory biology course. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), 251-262.

Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2004). The critical thinking community. Retrieved October 24,            2014,            from            Defining            critical            thinking:

Serwatka, J. (2003). Assessment in on-line CIS courses. Journal of computer information systems , XLIII (3), 16-20.

Sharpe, R., Benfield, G., Roberts, G., & Francis, R. (2006, October). The undergraduate experience of blended e-learning: a review of UK literature and practice.

Theresa, T. (2014). eHow. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from The difference in Online vs face-to-face teaching: online-vs_-face_to_face-teaching.html 

Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: How to integrate online and traditional learning. London: Kogan Page.

US Department of Education. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practice in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.

Watson, J. (2008). Blended earning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education. NACOL (North American Council for Online Learning).

Wong, L., & Victoria, M.  F. (2014).  Student attitudes to traditional and online methods of delivery. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 1-13.

Yeen-Ju, H. T., Mai, N., & Selvaretnam, B. (2015). Enhancing problem-solving skills in an authentic blended learning environment: A Malaysian context. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, V (11), 841- 846.

Note: This article was presented UKI English Education Department Collegiate Forum held on Friday, April 8, 2016


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.